Legal Opinion

Ferrell v. Keel

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 15, 1912PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Jackson Chancery Court; George T. Humphries, Chancellor.

1Per curiam

In case No. 2046, Ferrell v. Keel, which has been argued and submitted, one of the principal points of controversy relates to the question of the validity or invalidity of an act of the General Assembly of 1911, its validity being assailed on the ground that the enacting clause does not conform to the constitutional requirement. The form of the enacting clause is “Be It Enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas.” The form prescribed by the last amendment to the Constitution, known a's the Initiative and Referendum Amendment, is “Be it Enacted by the People of the State of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pearce v. AtwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
  2. Stockwell v. Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  3. North Bloomfield Gravel Mining Co. v. KeyserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mears v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  2. Black v. CockrillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  3. McCoy v. HandlinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  4. School District No. 18 v. Grubbs Special School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  5. Copeland v. HuffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API