Legal Opinion

Black v. Cockrill

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 26, 1965No. 5-3525PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Associate Justice.

The petitioners filed in this court an original petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to compel respondent, the Judge of the Third Division of the Pulaski Circuit Court, to transfer a pending civil suit from that division to the Second Division of that court. The petitioners are the plaintiffs in the pending case.

When they filed their case it was regularly assigned, pursuant to the local court rules, to the Third Division and by agreement of the parties it was set for jury trial. Before trial, however, the petitioners filed a motion to have the cause…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hooker v. ParkinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  2. State v. SloanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
  3. Hackler v. BakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  4. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  5. Hines v. MillsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Mears v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  2. City of North Little Rock v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  3. Munson v. AbbottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Vault v. AdkissonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  5. Hicks v. Arkansas State Medical BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API