Legal Opinion

Reishus-Remer Land Co. v. Benner

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 29, 1904No. Nos. 13,763 — (203)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court tor Hennepin county, Simpson, J., denying a motion for a new trial, or for judgment in favor of defendant notwithstanding the verdict.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Action to recover a commission alleged to have been earned in procuring a purchaser for real estate owned by defendant, and which plaintiff was authorized to sell. Plaintiff had a verdict in the court below, and defendant appealed from an order denying his alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or for a new trial.

The action was brought to recover the reasonable value of plaintiff’s services in procuring a purchaser for certain real estate owned by defendant, or held by him for sale, for which he had authorized plaintiff to procure a purchaser. The complaint alleges .all…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hubachek v. HazzardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  2. Henninger v. BurchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  3. Lautenschlager v. HunterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  4. Iselin v. SimonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  5. Register Printing Co. v. WillisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Leadville Mining Co. v. HemphillArizona Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Quist v. GoodfellowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Confer Bros. v. CurrierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. Coon v. St. Paul Park Realty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  5. Ballweber v. KernNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API