Legal Opinion

Quist v. Goodfellow

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 28, 1906No. Nos. 14,925—(100)PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Action in the municipal court of Minneapolis to recover a commission of $462.50 in finding a purchaser for real estate. The case was tried before Waite, J., who directed a verdict in favor of defendant. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Action to recover a commission alleged to have been earned by -plaintiff in procuring a purchaser for certain real estate belonging to defendant. The court below, at the conclusion of the trial, directed a verdict for defendant, on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to justify recovery by plaintiff; and the latter appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial. The only question presented is whether the court below erred in so directing a verdict.

The facts, briefly stated, are as follows: Some time in the fall of 1905 'plaintiff and defendant had a conversation with…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wylie v. . Marine National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Tinges v. MoaleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1866
  3. Fairchild v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  4. Putnam v. HowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  5. Gamble v. GretherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Handley v. ShafferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Smith v. PreissSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  3. Dancy v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Ritch v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  5. Offutt & Oldham v. WintersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API