Legal Opinion

Aultman-Taylor Machinery Co. v. Forrest

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 8, 1917No. 8819PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action to recover balance due on promissory note after application of amount received from sale of chattel security. Judgment for defendant. Error to the District Court of La Plata County, Hon. W. N. Searcy, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

This action is to recover on five promissory notes in the aggregate sum of $650.00 executed and delivered by the defendant in error, defendant below, to the plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, on the 20th day of July, 1901, secured by a chattel mortgage on a threshing machine engine. The notes and mortgage were executed within the state of Kansas, where the defendant then resided. The case upon a former trial was before the Court of Appeals, reported in 23 Colo. App. 558, 130 Pac. 1086.

The judgment of the trial court in favor of the defendant was reversed by the Court of Appeals and a new…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Waite v. DennisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Denny v. Van DusenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  3. Reynolds v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  4. McConnell v. People ex rel. PurvinesIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  5. O. S. Kelly Co. v. McCartySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Conway v. SkidmoreWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Mills Novelty Co. v. TranseauSuperior Court of Delaware · 1939
  3. Warner v. Yellow Manufacturing Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API