Legal Opinion

Denny v. Van Dusen

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1882PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error from Brown District Gourt. The nature iff the action, and the facts, appear in Denny v. Faulkner, 22 Xas. 90, et seq., and in. the opinion, infra. Trial at the February Term, l&81, of the district court, and judgment for Lawrence Van Dusen, as administrator de bonis non of the estate of O. P. Faulkner, deceased, for $4,180.53, and against Denny and Redman, who bring the case here.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

This case has been to this court once before, and the opinion then filed will be found in 22 Xas. 89. The judgment theretofore rendered was at that time reversed, and the case remanded for another trial.

This second trial was had before the district court, without a jury; special findings of fact and conclusions of law were made, and judgment was entered thereon against the plaintiffs in error for the sum of $4,180.53. Exceptions were duly taken, and the record is now before us for review.

*438The controversy as it now stands is alone between the…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Watkins v. LaytonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. Sheehan v. LevyWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Fourth National Bank v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  4. Geiser Manufacturing Co. v. KrogmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  5. Wygal v. BigelowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API