Legal Opinion

O. S. Kelly Co. v. McCarty

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 9, 1907No. 13,519PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from Linn district court; Walter L. Simons, judge.

1Per curiam

This was an actiori to recover upon two promissory notes given to plaintiff by the defendants for the purchase of a thrashing-machine engine, *819separator, and a wagon and certain attachments. The' plaintiff held a mortgage upon this and other property, which it had foreclosed, and, after paying the expensed thereof, credited the proceeds on the purchase-price,* which according to its calculations left a balance due, amounting to $669.17 and interest, which it sought! to recover.

The answer claimed some additional credits, by reason of some small payments and the sale of other mortgaged property,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Transport Equipment Company v. Guaranty State BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  2. Ulrich v. Security Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Conway v. SkidmoreWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Aultman-Taylor Machinery Co. v. ForrestSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917
  5. Aultman & Taylor Machinery Co. v. ForestColorado Court of Appeals · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API