Legal Opinion

Mills Novelty Co. v. Transeau

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided August 1, 1939No. 42PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Richards, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

The only issue presented at the trial of this case was the value of the property at the time of the seizure on January 30,1937. The motion for a new trial calls for a review of the action of the Court refusing to admit the testimony of Sherman T. Transeau, Winnie Harder, Irwin Harder and Octavia Bach to show the value of said property; and admitting the testimony of Edward F. Knocke to show the value of said property.

We desire to call attention in the beginning to the complicated nature of the machinery which is the subject of this litigation.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. Steel & Tube Co. of AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
  2. Allaun v. Consolidated Oil Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1929
  3. Parmenter v. . FitzpatrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Baltimore Belt Railroad v. SattlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  5. Mayor C.C. of Balto. v. Park Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Travelocity.com v. ComptrollerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API