Legal Opinion
State v. Lozar
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 31, 1990No. C5-89-2144, C0-89-2200PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAROLD W. SCHULTZ, Judge.
Appellants Larry and Eloise Rae Lozar were jointly charged in Lake County District Court with possession of marijuana with intent to sell or distribute, and possession of marijuana by a dealer without affixing state tax stamps. The charges against the Lozars arose following the seizure, pursuant to warrant, of approximately 750 pounds of marijuana from their greenhouse, garage and residence. Following an omnibus hearing, the trial court refused to suppress the evidence. The Lozars have sought review of the trial court’s pretrial order by pleading not guilty,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Murray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. DelRioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- State v. LiebergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. BarajasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. DenisonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.