Legal Opinion
State v. Martinez
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 12, 1998No. C0-97-2288, C9-97-2290PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD D. MULALLY, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s suppression of evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant containing a no-knock provision. We affirm.
FACTS
An officer of the Warren police department applied to the Marshall County District Court for a warrant to search the trailer home owned by respondent Esmerelda Rivera Martinez and occupied by Martinez and respondent Salvador Hernandez Otero. The court authorized an unannounced no-knoek, nighttime search warrant, and officers executed it on June 28, 1997. The officers seized a rifle, cocaine, and heroin and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Richards v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wilson v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. OthoudtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tracht v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Carroll v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Garza v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. AnhaltCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. BotelhoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.