Smalis v. Pennsylvania
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice White
At the close of the prosecution’s case in chief, the trial court dismissed certain charges against petitioners on the ground that the evidence presented was legally insufficient to support a conviction. The question presented is whether the Double Jeopardy Clause bars the prosecution from appealing this ruling.
I
Petitioners, husband and wife, owned a building housing a restaurant and some apartments that burned under suspicious circumstances, killing two of the tenants. Petitioners were charged with various crimes in connection with this fire, including criminal homicide, reckless…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by316 opinions
- Price, Warden v. VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Smith v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Evans v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- In re RenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Gikas v. ZolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
311 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.