Legal Opinion

Smith v. Massachusetts

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 22, 2005No. 03-8661PublishedCited by 238 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia

Midway through a jury trial, the judge acquitted petitioner of one of the three offenses charged. The question presented in this case is whether the Double Jeopardy Clause forbade the judge to reconsider that acquittal later in the trial.

I

Petitioner Melvin Smith was tried before a jury in the Superior Court of Suffolk County, Massachusetts, on charges relating to the shooting of his girlfriend’s cousin. The indictments charged three counts: armed assault with intent to murder; assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon; and unlawful possession of a firearm. The “firearm” element of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. McGautha v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by238 opinions

  1. Dietz v. BouldinSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. Evans v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  4. People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Benavidez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010

233 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API