Legal Opinion

Starzinski v. Starzinski

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1953PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGehx, J.

The defendant makes no serious attack upon that part of the judgment which grants plaintiff a divorce. His complaint is that the award given her in the division of the estate is excessive; that it so appears without regard to the evidence discovered by him after judgment; and that if he is wrong in that respect the judgment should be vacated or, in the alternative, a new trial granted in order that the court might consider such newly discovered evidence in its determination of the amount to be awarded.

Laying aside for the moment consideration of the question whether there should be a new…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ward v. Prospect Manor Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Gauger v. GaugerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  3. White v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Bruhn v. BruhnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Mickoleski v. BeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roddis v. RoddisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Schreiber v. SchreiberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Bernfeld v. BernfeldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API