Legal Opinion

Bruhn v. Bruhn

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1928PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.

In this case the parties, when marrying after an acquaintance of less than six months, had each informed the other of the extent of their respective property holdings. After some fourteen months, part of which time the two had lived apart, their matrimonial barque was wrecked for causes which the trial court found were more properly chargeable to the defendant than to the plaintiff, which finding the record supports and defendant does not here question.

*360The plaintiff, appellant here, does not expressly claim that there should be no division of his property, and by the position taken on the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wait v. PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Gauger v. GaugerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Pfingsten v. PfingstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  4. First Wisconsin National Bank v. JahnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Roder v. RoderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kronforst v. KronforstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Dresser v. DresserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Heffernan v. HeffernanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Strandberg v. StrandbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Manske v. ManskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API