Legal Opinion

Brighton Physical Therapy, Inc. v. One Beacon Insurance

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided June 30, 2011Published

1Opinion of the CourtSwan, J.

Brighton Physical Therapy, Inc. (“Brighton”) commenced this action as an unpaid party against One Beacon Insurance Company (“Beacon”), alleging Beacon’s failure to pay personal injury protection (“PIP”) benefits under G.L.c. 90, §34M, and, consequently, its violations of G.L.c. 93A. Beacon moved for summary judgment. The motion was denied, the trial judge ruling, “It appears that [Beacon’s] legal position is correct, however, not sufficiently supported.” Beacon reined the motion with additional documentation. This time the motion was allowed. Brighton has appealed that ruling.

On a motion for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Augat, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Nashua Corp. v. First State InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  3. Dominguez v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  4. Khudisman v. CNA InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
  5. Labbe v. Commerce Insurance Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API