Legal Opinion

Westbrooks v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board & Greyhound Lines, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 31, 1988No. C002555PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EVANS, Acting P. J.

In this proceeding we review a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board denying Jimmy Westbrooks’s claim for benefits for emotional injury arising out of a reckless driving incident while Westbrooks was on an assigned run for his employer, Greyhound Lines. The question presented is whether Westbrooks’s reckless driving took him outside the course of his employment. We conclude it did not.

The material facts are without dispute. On September 30, 1984, West-brooks, a bus driver for Greyhound, was driving an assigned run from Sacramento to Redding. On a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Rodgers v. Kemper Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Dimmig v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Western Pac. R. R. Co. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Meyer v. BlackmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. HodgesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. 3 Stonedeggs, Inc. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2024
  3. 3 Stonedeggs, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API