Legal Opinion

3 Stonedeggs, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 10, 2024No. C098711Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 4/23/24 Certified for Publication 5/10/24 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Placer) ---- 3 STONEDEGGS, INC. et al., C098711 Petitioners, (Super. Ct. No. ADJ14015513) v. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD AND BRADEN NANEZ, Respondents. Under the “commercial traveler” rule in workers’ compensation law, an employee traveling on the employer’s business is regarded as acting within the course of employment during the entire period of travel. (LaTourette v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1998)

17 Cal.4th 644, 652

(LaTourette).) As a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Lisa M. v. Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Hinojosa v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Western Pac. R. R. Co. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Western Growers Insurance v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API