Legal Opinion

Smith v. Deering

District Court, S.D. Georgia

Decided December 20, 1994No. Civ. A. 293-87PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ALAIMO, District Judge.

The Sheriff of Camden County, Georgia, William E. Smith (“Smith”), was arrested pursuant to an indictment that was later nol prossed. On June 29, 1993, Smith filed this federal action under the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against Defendants, Patrick D. Deering (“Deering”), Michael J. Bowers (“Bowers”), Lee J. Sweat, Jr. (“Sweat”), and Joe B. Jackson, Jr. (“Jackson”). This case is presently before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Urbanique Production v. City of MontgomeryDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2006
  2. McClendon v. MayDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1999
  3. Smith v. DeeringCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
  4. Sorrow v. City of AtlantaDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API