Legal Opinion
McClendon v. May
District Court, S.D. Georgia
Decided February 3, 1999No. Civil Action CV498-205PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOORE, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendants May and Martin have moved to dismiss Plaintiff McClendon’s complaint on several grounds. Similarly, Defendant Effingham County has filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. McClendon has responded to both motions.
McClendon’s complaint advances the following five counts: (1) Assistant District Attorney May is liable for damages to McClendon under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 because he allegedly violated McClendon’s Fifth and Sixth Amendment Rights; (2) District Attorney Martin is hable for damages to McClendon under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 because he…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Neville v. Classic GardensDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2001
- Schlueter v. BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONSDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2010
- Vandiver v. Meriwether Cnty.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2018
- Musson v. JonesDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2025