Legal Opinion

Koster v. June’s Trucking, Inc

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 8, 2001No. Docket 212741PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBandstra, C.J.

Michigan Mutual Insurance Co. (Michigan Mutual) 1 appeals by leave granted from an order entered in a garnishment proceeding compelling it to turn over to plaintiffs its entire file regarding a claim and litigation against defendants, its insured. Michigan Mutual contends that it should not be required to produce defendants’ file, when the corporate defendant has dissolved and the individual defendants have died, because the file is protected by the attorney-client privilege and the work-product privilege. We conclude that the portions of the file for which a privilege was asserted may be…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Leo Logan v. Commercial Union Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  2. Atlanta International Insurance v. BellMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Meirthew v. LastMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Reed Dairy Farm v. Consumers Powers Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. People v. GilmoreMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Augustine v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. In Re Costs and Attorney FeesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Leibel v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. D’alessandro Contracting Group, LLC v. WrightMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Urban Outfitters, Inc. v. DPIC Companies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API