Legal Opinion

KATSURA v. City of San Buenaventura

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 15, 2007No. B190630PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PERREN, J.

Yoshiro Katsura, individually, and doing business as Katsura Consulting Engineers, appeals from a judgment after a bench trial awarding him $2,920, the amount due on a contract with respondent City of San Buenaventura (City). Katsura contends the City owes him an additional $20,823.75 for extra work he performed that was not specified in the contract but was purportedly orally authorized by a City employee and an agent of the City. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On January 18, 2000, Katsura entered into an engineering consultant contract with the City. Under the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Zottman v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Weitzenkorn v. LesserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Los Angeles Dredging Co. v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Domar Electric, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Reams v. CooleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Retired Employees Ass'n of Orange County, Inc. v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Sheppard v. North Orange County Regional Occupational ProgramCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Green Valley Landowners Ass'n v. City of VallejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. P&D Consultants, Inc. v. City of CarlsbadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Mammoth Lakes Land Acquisition, LLC v. Town of Mammoth LakesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API