Legal Opinion

Gooschin v. Mercer Casualty Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1934No. 25140. Department TwoPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This appeal is from a judgment ' against appellant in a garnishment proceeding.

On February 18, 1933, respondent secured a judgment against defendant Andrew B. J. Ladd in the sum of $22,575.95 in an action to recover damages sustained in an automobile accident. On the same day that the above judgment was entered, respondent sued out a writ of garnishment directed to appellant. Subsequently, the defendant in the main action appealed from that judgment, which appeal was pending at the time the garnishment herein was issued and at the time it was heard in the court below. The defendant in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ford v. Aetna Life Insurance Co. of HartfordWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Gooschin v. LaddWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Johnson v. McGilchristWashington Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. L. J. Dowell, Inc. v. United Pacific Casualty InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Hinton v. CarmodyWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Application of SpriggsArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Lechleitner v. CummingsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  5. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Calloway Ross, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API