Lechleitner v. Cummings
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of-the court was delivered by
Thiele, J.:
The appeals here considered represent two phases of one action in the trial court. Owing to the nature of the questions presented the following statement is made:
Plaintiff brought an action against defendant Cummings to recover damages for the wrongful death of her husband. A trial was had, a judgment rendered, a new trial granted, and an appeal taken by the defendant Cummings to this court, where the rulings and judgment of the trial court were affirmed. See Lechleitner v. Cummings, 159 Kan. 171, 152 P. 2d 843. Thereafter a second trial was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. NakanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Waples-Platter Grocer Co. v. Texas and Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1902
- Edwards v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Ancateau ex rel. Trust Co. of Chicago v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943
- Arp v. BlakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. HutchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- Rogers v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
- Johnston, Administratrix v. EcordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- Cansler v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
- Ray v. CaudillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.