Legal Opinion

Kula v. Prososki

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1985No. 83-920PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, J.

This was a suit for injunctive relief and damages. It arose out of alleged acts of the defendants Kenneth M. and Karen L. Prososki, adjoining landowners to the plaintiff’s farm, and the defendants county of Nance and East Newman Township, the parties responsible for the construction and maintenance of a public road and culverts separating the farms of the plaintiff and the defendants Prososki.

The claim of the plaintiff was that the Prososkis filled in a natural watercourse, causing surface waters to back onto the plaintiff’s land. He alleged that the other defendants raised the adjoining…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gentry v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Armbruster v. Stanton-Pilger Drainage DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Patrick v. City of BellevueNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  4. City of Omaha v. MatthewsNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Beach v. City of FairburyNebraska Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Colman v. Utah State Land BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Indian Hills Community Church v. County Board of EqualizationNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Parriott v. Drainage Dist. No. 6 of PeruNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Slusarski v. County of PlatteNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Dishman v. Nebraska Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API