Legal Opinion
Phi Delta Theta Fraternity v. JA Buchroeder & Company
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided March 10, 1966No. 683, 684, 729, 736, 737, 751-755, 792PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN W. OLIVER, District Judge.
Introductory
In accordance with Rules 16, 42(b) and 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and after extensive pretrial proceedings the parties agreed for the purpose of obtaining a definitive ruling on certain questions of law presented by certain motions for summary judgment and to dismiss filed before the recent reassignment of these cases that such questions be presented under a factual stipulation entered solely for that purpose.
Two of the actions, Nos. 683 and 684, have been referred to as the “Trademark Cases.” The other actions, Nos. 729, 736, 737,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- White Motor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. SteffensSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. Church & Dwight Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Harvey v. Fearless Farris Wholesale, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Car-Freshner Corp. v. Auto Aid Manufacturing Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1977
- Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. V.E.B. Carl Zeiss, JenaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Estee Lauder, Inc. v. Fragrance Counter, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.