Legal Opinion
Car-Freshner Corp. v. Auto Aid Manufacturing Corp.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided August 9, 1977No. 76-CV-501PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM — DECISION AND ORDER
MUNSON, District Judge.
This is an action in which the plaintiffs, engaged in the business of selling various air deodorizers, bug removers, chrome polishes, window cleaners, and the like, seek damages for alleged trademark infringements and unfair competition on the part of the defendants. The dispute involves the manufacture and sale of air deodorizers bearing the shape of a pine tree, and composed of absorbent bodies impregnated with a fragrant deodorant.
There are two separate motions now pending before this Court. In the first, the defendants seek a change of…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- In re SkolnickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Reyno v. Piper Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- The Clorox Company, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Sterling Winthrop, Inc. Reckitt & Colman, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Shaw v. Rolex Watch, U.S.A., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Coface v. Optique Du Monde, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Heyco, Inc. v. HeymanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.