Legal Opinion

Kline v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 1, 1991No. B055511PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*514Opinion

THE COURT.*

Lester Kline, the 74-year old plaintiff in a personal injury action against real parties in interests seeks a writ of mandate to prevent the trial court from denying him a preferential trial date (Code Civ. Proc., § 36, subd. (a)) 1 and ordering the action submitted to compulsory arbitration. (§ 1141.11.) We have notified the parties a peremptory writ may issue in the first instance (Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc. (1984) 36 Cal.3d 171 [203 Cal.Rptr. 626, 681 P.2d 893]), and have read and considered the opposition to the petition filed by the respondent. As will…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Tevis v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Rice v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Koch-Ash v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Nourafchan v. MinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fox v. Superior Court of City & Cnty. of S.F., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Fox v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API