Legal Opinion

Curry v. Administrator

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided November 15, 1957No. File 102995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtTroland, J.

The claimant, Lillian Curry, a married woman who was employed at Casco Products Company, Bridgeport, left her employment December 28, 1956, because she was pregnant. Mrs. Curry was expecting her child on May 9,1957. Her doctor had advised her to leave work at the end of November, 1956, because claimant’s work involved climbing two flights of stairs two or three times a day, and the doctor felt that such stair climbing was ill-advised during pregnancy. Nevertheless, Mrs. Curry continued to work until December 28,1956, as above stated, when, there being no other work for her at the plant which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Waterbury Savings Bank v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  2. Chambers v. LoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  3. Hartford Production Credit Asso. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  4. Packard Motor Car Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Morris v. Unemployment Insurance Appeal BoardSuperior Court of Delaware · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API