Legal Opinion

Harte v. Town of Dartmouth

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 20, 1998No. 97-P-0619PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

In 1992-1994 the town of Dartmouth widened Faunce Comer Road, a north-south road that intersects with Interstate Route 195. None of the property of the plaintiff Harte, who does business as Harte Toyota, was taken for the project. He seeks damages, however, under G. L. c. 79, § 12, based on a claim of substantial diminution in the accessibility of his auto dealership to potential customers. The judge allowed the town’s motion for summary judgment, and the case is here on Harte’s appeal from the resulting dismissal.

The facts that are material to the judge’s decision and ours are not in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fidelity Management & Research Co. v. OstranderMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  2. Wine v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Hyde v. City of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  4. Sheldon v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  5. Tassinari v. Massachusetts Turnpike AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Muse v. Foodmaster Super MarketMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
  2. Paul's Lobster, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  3. Kiernan v. City of SalemMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  4. Soeder v. DesrocherMassachusetts Superior Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API