Legal Opinion

Muse v. Foodmaster Super Market

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided May 19, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoven, J.

This is an action in negligence to recover for injuries sustained by the plaintiff in a fall in the defendant’s supermarket. Summary judgment was entered for the defendant, and the plaintiff has appealed pursuant to Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A., Rule 8C.

Viewing the parties’ summary judgment materials in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, Bisson v. Eck, 430 Mass. 406, 407 (1999); Harte v. Dartmouth, 45 Mass. App. Ct. 779, 780 n.2 (1998), the record indicates the following: The plaintiff was a customer at the defendant’s supermarket on May 25,1996. As she was proceeding into the produce…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Oliveri v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Deagle v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  4. Luz v. Stop & Shop, Inc. of PeabodyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  5. Toubiana v. PriestlyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DiCarlo v. DeMoulas Supermarkets, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2006
  2. Morse v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2001
  3. Freitas v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API