Legal Opinion

Tassinari v. Massachusetts Turnpike Authority

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 12, 1964PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpiegel, J.

This is a petition for assessment of damages under Gr. L. c. 79. The jury viewed the locus. Upon con-*223elusion of the petitioner’s opening statement the court allowed a motion by the respondent for a directed verdict “upon the pleadings and the opening,” to which the petitioner excepted.

When a verdict for the respondent is directed upon the pleadings and the opening statement, the “facts set forth in the opening must be considered as true and in the light most favorable” to the petitioner. Aragona v. Parrella, 325 Mass. 583, 584. Cohen v. Suburban Sidney-Hill, Inc. 343 Mass. 217. In his opening…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wine v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. General Motors Corporation v. BlevinsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1956
  3. Hyde v. City of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  4. Aragona v. ParrellaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  5. Cohen v. Suburban Sidney-Hill, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc. v. FisherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Hamilton v. Conservation Commission of OrleansMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  3. Alexander v. JenningsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Alexander v. JenningsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. MUNICIPAL LIGHT CO, ASHBURNHAM v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API