Legal Opinion

Murray v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 2, 1988No. 541-85TPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NETTESHEIM, Judge.

This case is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. The Federal Circuit vacated a judgment of dismissal entered by Senior Judge White upon his decision that the complaint failed to state the required elements of a taking claim. The remand instructed the court to adjudicate plaintiffs’ claim that the Internal Revenue Service’s extinguishment of plaintiffs’ lien by refusing to allow them to redeem the encumbered property and conveying it to a superior lienholder constituted a taking under the fifth amendment to the U.S. *18Constitution. Murray v. United…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Aquilino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. United States v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Centerstate Bank Central Florida, N.A. v. KrauseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  2. Hartle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  3. Bair v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API