Legal Opinion
Hartle v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided April 26, 1991No. 255-89LPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LYDON, Senior Judge:
This case is before the court after a trial on the merits regarding whether plaintiffs are entitled to rescission of a contract for purchase of a home from the government. For the following reasons, plaintiffs are not entitled to rescind the contract.
FACTS
In May of 1986, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) advertised a large number of HUD-acquired properties for sale in two local Denver, Colorado newspapers, including a piece of *844real property together with two structures situated thereon, located at 4678 S. Pennsylvania Street, in the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Grimes v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Wilson v. Omaha Indian TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Quinault Allottee Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- National Presto Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Denaxas v. Sandstone Court of Bellevue, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
- Denaxas v. Sandstone Court of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Dairyland Power Cooperative v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Sovran Bank/DC National v. United States (In Re Aumiller)District Court, District of Columbia · 1994
- Pendelton v. WitcoskiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.