Legal Opinion

Bair v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 11, 2007No. 04-1689CPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BASKIR, Judge.

This case involves an alleged taking without compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment. The Plaintiffs (“Growers”) claim they have state law liens on the crop of sugar beets delivered in 2000 to Pacific Northwest Sugar Company, LLC (“PNSC”). The Commodity Credit Corporation (“CCC”) has a superior interest in the same sugar as a result of PNSC’s utilization of a Federal program that provides loans to beet processors in exchange for a “super-priority” security interest in sugar inventory. The Growers’ state law liens on 2000 crop year sugar attached before PNSC…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API