Carrillo v. El Mirage Roadhouse, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VOSS, Judge.
The issue in this appeal is whether the duty expressed in Ontiveros v. Borak, 136 Ariz. 500, 667 P.2d 200 (1983), Brannigan v. Raybuck, 136 Ariz. 513, 667 P.2d 213 (1983), and A.R.S. § 4-244(14) is broad enough to proscribe a liquor licensee from indirectly providing alcoholic beverages to intoxicated persons. We resolve the issue in the affirmative.
The appellant is Mary Esther Carrillo, the wife of Salvadore Carrillo (Salvadore), the decedent, on her own behalf and as personal representative of Salvadore, and on behalf of the surviving children, Cynthia Carrillo and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ontiveros v. BorakArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Markowitz v. Arizona Parks BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- McCormack v. Oklahoma Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Brigance v. Velvet Dove Restaurant, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Brannigan v. RaybuckArizona Supreme Court · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Petolicchio v. Santa Cruz County Fair & Rodeo Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Callender v. Transpacific Hotel Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Bruce v. Chas Roberts Air Conditioning, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- St. George v. PlimptonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Rodriguez v. American Cyanamid Co.District Court, D. Arizona · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.