Alaska Public Employees Ass'n v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURKE, Justice.
This case requires that we decide whether the state’s classification plan for state jobs and its assignment of salary ranges to that plan are mandatory subjects of collective bargaining under Alaska’s Public Employment Relations Act (PERA). We conclude that these are not mandatory subjects of collective bargaining. Accordingly, we affirm the decisions of the administrative agency and the court below.
I
Pursuant to the State Personnel Act, AS 39.25, the state must establish a “position classification plan” for all state employees covered by the Act.1 Under such a plan, each…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Central Michigan University Faculty Ass'n v. Central Michigan UniversityMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Kenai Peninsula Borough School District v. Kenai Peninsula Education Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. Public Safety Employees Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
- University Education Ass'n v. Regents of the University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Millman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1992
- Moore v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. Public Safety Employees Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. Alaska State Employees Ass'n/AFSCME Local 52Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Griswold v. City of HomerAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.