Legal Opinion

Goode v. Antioch University

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 14, 1988No. 87-673PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Associate Judge:

Appellant Jesse P. Goode appeals the dismissal with prejudice of his complaint for breach of contract against appellees Antioch University, Alan E. Guskin, and Robert L. Aller. 1 Goode contends principally that the trial court abused its discretion in granting the motion to dismiss because Goode was not required to exhaust his administrative remedies and the doctrine of primary jurisdiction does not require that he first resort to the agency for a determination of his claims. We hold that the exhaustion and primary jurisdiction doctrines have no application;…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Drayton v. Poretsky Management, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Basch v. George Washington UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Rohr Industries, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. Richard Elrod, Sheriff, Cook CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Gilmore v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Northeast Neighbors for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. AppleTree Institute for Education Innovation, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Gilles v. WareDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Gilles v. WareDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API