Legal Opinion

['YOUNG v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HOUSING AUTHORITY']

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 12, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-0652PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiffs Jacqueline Young, Latheda Wilson, and Deaf-REACH filed suit on May 7, 2013, against the District of Columbia Housing Authority (“DCHA”) alleging that DCHA violated Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), and the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”) by failing to make its program accessible to people with disabilities, specifically, hearing disabilities. Plaintiffs Young and Wilson are two individuals with hearing impairments, and Plaintiff Deaf-REACH is a non-profit organization…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hunter Ex Rel. A.H. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  2. Rosa v. 600 Broadway Partners, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  3. Lozano v. C.A. Martinez Family Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2015
  4. Dl v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  5. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC v. United States Department of EducationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API