Lozano v. C.A. Martinez Family Ltd. Partnership
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ, Chief Judge.
Defendants C.A. Martinez Family Limited Partnership and Santo’ Tomas, Inc. (“Defendants”),, have filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(h)(3). Plaintiff Enrique Lozano has filed a motion for summary judgment. For the reasons discussed below, Defendants’ motion is DENIED.and Plaintiffs motion is GRANTED.
I. BACKGROUND
On February 12, 2014, Plaintiff commenced this action. Plaintiff is a paraplegic who uses a wheelchair for mobility and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Molski v. M.J. Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Tandy v. City of WichitaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Sheely v. MRI Radiology Network, P.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Feltenstein v. City of New RochelleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Gastelum v. HEES IIDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Gastelum v. Kohl's Department Stores Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Gastelum v. Pinnacle Hotel Circle LPDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
- Gastelum v. TC Heritage Inn 2 of Bakersfield LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.