Legal Opinion

Lockwood v. Bassett

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1883PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Wayne. Bill of foreclosure. Cross-bill to clear title. Complainant in the original bill and defendant in the cross-bill', appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

The complainant, as administrator of Ohauncey M. Lockwood, claims a lien in the nature of a mortgage under a deed given by the defendant Sarah M. Bassett and Henry Bassett, her husband, to the intestate of certain lands the title to which at the date of the deed was in the husband. The lien which is claimed is for the sum of eight thousand dollars which it is conceded by the defense was had by Mrs. Bassett from the intestate, who was her brother. But Mrs. Bassett insists that the money was a gift to her from the intestate ; and the case, so far as it rests upon the facts, turns mainly upon…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pence v. ArbuckleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
  2. Van Etta v. EvensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Ragsdale v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Swartz v. BallouSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  5. Field v. StaggSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Livonia Property Holdings, L.L.C. v. 12840-12976 Farmington Road Holdings, L.L.C.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
  2. Stroh v. O'HearnMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Wilson v. HubbardWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Detroit & Northern Michigan Building & Loan Ass'n v. OramMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Palmer v. SharpMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API