Pence v. Arbuckle
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the court of common pleas of Bamsey county, refusing a new trial, after a trial before Brill, J., anda jury.
1Opinion of the CourtGileillan, C. J.
Ejectment to recover a lot in the city of St. Paul. The complaint is in the usual form. The answer puts in issue the allegations of the complaint, and alleges new matter. On the trial the following facts were admitted, to wit:
In the month of August, 1857, the plaintiff, being the owner of the lot in question, delivered to Oscar Stephenson, in St. Paul, a blank .form of warranty deed, containing all the usual printed matter contained in printed warranty deeds, signed by plaintiff and wife, and acknowledged by them in due form of law as their act and deed, before a proper officer, who certified…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- President, Directors & Co. of Mechanics' Bank v. New-York & New Haven RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
3Cited by43 opinions
- Illinois Trust & Savings Bank v. City of Arkansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Scollans v. RollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Paxson v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
- State v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
- Western Land Ass'n v. BanksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.