Stroh v. O'Hearn
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Ottawa; Padgham, J. Bill by Conrad Stroh against John O’Hearn, Joseph Bauman, and other defendants for subrogation. Said Joseph Bauman filed a cross-bill praying for affirmative relief. From a decree for complainant and said Bauman, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.
This suit involves a tangled tale of *167misunderstanding, bad management, and bad advice in the administration of the estate of Dominick O’Hearn, formerly a farmer residing in the township of Tallmadge, Ottawa county, where he owned a farm of 180 acres, which is now the subject of this litigation. The accompanying plat of said farm may serve to more readily understand its shape and the relative location, of the different parts now in controversy.
On January 15,1892, said Dominick O’Hearn, being the owner of this farm free and ‘unincumbered, together with personal property of considerable value,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Defreese v. LakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Kelly v. KellyMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Plympton v. Boston DispensaryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Detroit Fire & Marine Insurance v. AspinallMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Whitney v. SalterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Hayward v. PlantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Michigan Hospital Service v. SharpeMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
- D'ANGELO v. Cornell Paperboard Products Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- The Dow Chemical Corporation v. Weevil-Cide Company, Inc. Research Products Company Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund v. Wisconsin Health Care Liability Insurance PlanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.