Legal Opinion

Yaen v. State

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1917No. Criminal No. 417PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Yavapai. Prank O. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, J.

The appellant was charged with the offense of selling whisky in violation of the prohibition amendment, article 23, state Constitution, and upon a trial of the charge was convicted, and appeals.

The information charging the offense was presented to and filed in the superior court of Yavapai county by the county attorney, on the thirteenth day of January, 1916. The appellant demurred to the information upon a number of grounds, among which, he charges that the information fails to allege that before the filing of the information a preliminary examination was had before any committing…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pearce v. FooteIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Leonard v. . PooleNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Buchanan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Lamm v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Bobo v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Guey v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Cummings v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Birch v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1918
  4. State v. ColeArizona Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API