Legal Opinion

State v. Cole

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1919No. Criminal No. 444PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Pima. S. L. Pattee, Judge.

1Per curiam

The county attorney filed an information ■against the defendant in the superior court of Pima county, charging him with a violation of the prohibition amendment. No preliminary examination was held in the case prior to filing the information. The court made an order dismissing the case for that reason, and the state appeals.

We have held that it is unnecessary to hold a preliminary examination in a misdemeanor case prior to the filing of an information charging the offense. Mo Yaen v. State, 18 Ariz. 491, L. R. A. 1917D, 1014, 163 Pac. 135; Birch v. State, 19 Ariz. 366, 171 Pac. 135; Cummings…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cummings v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Birch v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Yaen v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Earp v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API