Legal Opinion
Lamm v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided November 28, 1910No. A-298PublishedCited by 15 opinions
Appeal from Washita County Court; L. R. Shem, Judge. Appellants were convicted of a violation of the prohibitory liquor law, and were each sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to be imprisoned for 30 days in the county jail, and they appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
FURMAN Presiding Judge.
First. It is contended that the court erred in refusing appellants’ motion to require the court stenographer to take down in shorthand all of the statements made by the court and attorneys in the presence and hearing of the jury. In support of this motion appellants’ counsel rely on sec. 1 of art. 7, Session Laws of 1905, page 326, which is as follows:
“It shall be the duty of the court reporter to take down in shorthand, and to correctly transcribe, when required, all the proceedings upon the trial of any cause, as well as all statements of counsel, the witnesses or the…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Moody v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Corliss v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1916
- Tudor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
- People v. CaseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.