Legal Opinion

State v. Robertson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 21, 1994No. 9318SC743PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Defendant brings forward several assignments of error. After carefully reviewing the record and briefs, we conclude that the trial court committed no error.

I

Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in allowing the victim to testify that defendant threatened her by saying, “ [I]f [she] told anybody what he [defendant] was going to do, he was going to hurt [her] like he hurt Koda.” The trial court allowed this testimony despite its previous ruling allowing defendant’s motion in limine to prohibit reference to defendant’s prior arrest, indictment, trial and acquittal of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Clyde Alvin Williford, Sr., Clyde Alvin Williford, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  2. State v. AgeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  3. State v. MeltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. MeekinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  5. State v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Chamberlain v. ThamesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  2. State v. MonkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. State v. FlukerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. State v. WalstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  5. State v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API