Legal Opinion

State v. Agee

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 10, 1990No. 208A89PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Justice.

This appeal presents the question whether defendant’s acquittal on a charge of misdemeanor possession of marijuana precludes the State from introducing, in a subsequent prosecution for felonious possession of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), evidence that defendant possessed marijuana at the time of his arrest on both charges. We answer in the negative, and we thus affirm the Court of Appeals.

Prior to defendant’s trial in superior court for possession of LSD, he filed a motion in limine to preclude any reference to his arrest on 27 March 1987 for the offenses of misdemeanor…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. State v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. StagerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  4. State v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  5. State v. RoacheSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API