Legal Opinion

Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 22, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

The defendant Southern Eailway Company contends: “That no cause of action is stated against the crossing watchman, Stanton (although the allegations of his negligence state a cause of action against the Southern Eailway Company). From this it follows that there is a fraudulent joinder of the crossing watchman. With the crossing watchman out of the case, a separable controversy exists between the plaintiff and the Southern Eailway Company which entitles the Southern Eailway Company to remove this case to the United States District Court.” We cannot agree with the contentions of defendant, the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Alabama Great Southern Railway Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SchwyhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. IdeSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harris v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Charlie T. Smith v. Universal Underwriters Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  3. Reynolds Am. Inc. v. Third Motion Equities Master Fund Ltd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2021
  4. Reynolds Am. Inc. v. Third Motion Equities Master Fund Ltd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API