Legal Opinion

Charlie T. Smith v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 12, 1985No. 83-8262PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In Smith v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co., 732 F.2d 129 (11th Cir.1984), we found that the case presented an important issue of Georgia law on which there was no clear, controlling precedent, and we certified the following question to the Supreme Court of Georgia: 1

Under Georgia’s interpretation of Section 324A of the Second Restatement of Torts can employee reliance on safety-inspections by his employer’s insurance company be shown by the employee’s testimony that he relied on the inspections together with his reasons for relying, or must the employee show acts or omissions in his own…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sims v. American Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  2. Huggins v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  3. Van Winkle v. American Steam Boiler Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1890
  4. Moody v. Martin Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  5. Providence Washington Insurance v. SimsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hutcherson v. Progressive Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  2. Andrew Halsey v. The Townsend Corp of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  3. Randy W. Berliner v. Milwaukee Electric Tool Corp., Ameren Corporation, Gary Krupey, Thomas C. See, G. George Haberberger, James Robert Dean, Timothy Carrico and Randy Shell, and Ameren Services CorporationMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Hutcherson v. Progressive CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API