Legal Opinion
State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Curry
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided August 8, 1984No. WCB 81-021, CA A27159, SC S30183PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.
The issue is whether under ORS 656.382(2) a workers’ compensation claimant is entitled to an award of attorney fees for work done in response to an insurer’s petition for review which is ultimately denied. The legal services which generated this claim for fees arose from our request that claimant’s attorney prepare a response to SAIF’s petition for review of a Court of Appeals decision.
The statute in question, ORS 656.382(2), provides:
“If a request for hearing, request for review, appeal or cross-appeal to the Court of Appeals or petition for review to the Supreme Court is initiated by an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- 1000 Friends of Ore. v. Bd. of Cty. Com'rs, Etc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Pacific Power & Light Co. v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Matter of Compensation of BrackeOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Teel v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
- U-Cart Concrete of Eugene, Inc. v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Saif Corp. v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Agripac, Inc. v. KitchelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Arvidson v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2020
- Shearer's Foods v. Hoffnagle (In re Hoffnagle)Oregon Supreme Court · 2018
- Santos v. Caryall TransportCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.